11
Jean Renart, romanziere del XIII secolo (Milano: Cisalpino, [1950?]), pp. 13-14. Cremonesi, who is not much interested in the problem of date, does not deal with the second half of Lejeune's argument.
12
«Sur la date de Guillaume de Dole», Romania, 82 (1961), 379-402. Lecoy's arguments are summed up in his edition. Le Roman de la Rose ou de Guillaume de Dole, CFMA, 91 (Paris; Champion, 1962), pp. vi-viii. Lejeune maintains her position, and explains why she rejects Lecoy's arguments, in «Le Roman de Guillaume de Dole et la Principauté de Liège», CCM, 17 (1974), 1-24. She reiterates her view in her article on «Jean Renart et le roman réaliste au XIIIe siècle», in Grundriss der romanischen Literaturen des Mittelalters, VI: Le Roman jusqu'à la fin du XIIIe siècle, 1. Partie historique, ed. Jean Frappier and Reinhold Grimm (Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1978), pp. 400-53, at p. 440.
13
«Per la datazione del Guillaume de Dole», CN, 25 (1965), 91-112.
14
Roman rose et rose rouge: le «Roman de la Rose ou de Guillaume de Dole» (Paris: Nizet, 1979), pp. 9-14.
15
A Literary History of France: The Middle Ages (London: Ernest Benn; New York: Barnes & Noble, 1974), p. 211.
16
Cassell's Encyclopaedia of World Literature, 2nd ed. (London: Cassell, 1973), II, 739.
17
Henry, Chrestomathie de la littérature en ancien français, 4th ed. (Bern: Francke, 1967), p. 138; Zumthor, Histoire littéraire de la France médiévale: VIe-XIVe siècles (Paris: PUF, 1954), p. 212; and Topsfield, The Penguin Companion to Literature, ed. Anthony K. Thorlby, II (Penguin: Harmondsworth, 1969), p. 399.
18
The reference is to the following version of Naissance: La Naissance du Chevalier au Cygne ou les enfants changés en cygnes, ed. Henry Alfred Todd (Baltimore: MLA, 1889; also published in PMLA, 4). This is the version now generally known to scholars as Elioxe.
19
Romania, 19 (1890), 314-40, at p. 320.
20
Barron, «Versions and Texts of the Naissance du Chevalier au Cygne», Romania, 89 (1968), 481-538, and Smith, «Studies in the Epic Poem Godefroi de Bouillon», PMLA, 27 (1912), 142-67, at p. 149.